News | Feb 07 2025

New Report Showcases Football’s Impact on the Climate Crisis

A person wearing white socks and cleats stepping on a soccer ball designed to look like the Earth, with black liquid splashing around it.

A new study by Scientists for Global Responsibility and the New Weather Institute has estimated that football’s global carbon footprint amounts to approximately same as the annual emissions of Austria. The report, Dirty Tackle, outlines football’s global environmental impact and urges governing bodies, such as FIFA and the UEFA, to take stronger action.

As global temperatures rise and extreme weather events disrupt sports schedules, including the disastrous wildfires in Los Angeles ahead of the 2026 FIFA World Cup, football is now confronting the environmental risks posed to both its players and its infrastructure. Despite this, the sport’s own contribution to climate change has largely flown under the radar.

The study estimates football’s global carbon footprint to 64-66 million tCO2e. This includes stadium energy use, travel for matches, merchandise production and sponsorship deals. 75% of football’s carbon footprint alone stems from sponsorships with high-polluting industries like oil, gas, airlines and fast food. According to lead researcher Dr. Stuart Parkinson, “football’s global appeal is being exploited by the world’s most polluting industries, deepening the climate crisis.”

An airplane parked at the center of an empty stadium with seating visible around the field.

Other major sources of emissions include fan travel (particularly by car and plane) and stadium construction for major tournaments. A single World Cup match is estimated to emit between 44,000 and 72,000 tCO2e, significantly more than a domestic league match. New stadiums built for events like the World Cup also contribute large amounts of emissions, often underused after the event.

Dirty Tackle urges football to phase out sponsorships with fossil fuel companies and reduce international travel to curb emissions. Additionally, with tournaments expanding, it recommends a focus shift to reduce the number of matches played to minimize air travel. Although some clubs are taking steps toward sustainability, the report stresses that wider coordinated efforts are needed. Forest Green Rovers, for example, is pioneering low-carbon initiatives and fan-led activations.

Given football’s vast cultural reach, the sport has the potential to drive significant change. If football leads the way in addressing its environmental impact, it could inspire broader shifts toward sustainability across industries. As the 2026 World Cup approaches, it will be interesting to see if football can curb its emissions and set a positive example for other sectors to follow.

“Football can be a powerful force for good. By taking responsibility for its own carbon footprint, the sport can help change the conversation about climate action and set a precedent for other industries to follow,” said Andrew Simms, co-director of the New Weather Institute.